4.3 Article

Cardiovascular safety of liraglutide assessed in a patient-level pooled analysis of phase 2-3 liraglutide clinical development studies

Journal

DIABETES & VASCULAR DISEASE RESEARCH
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 237-240

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1479164111408937

Keywords

diabetes mellitus; glucagon-like peptide-1; incretin; myocardial infarction; safety

Funding

  1. Medicines Company
  2. Novo Nordisk
  3. Abbott Vascular
  4. Amylin Pharmaceuticals
  5. Boston Scientific
  6. Volcano Corporation
  7. Terumo Medical
  8. AstraZeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We assessed the cardiovascular safety of liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, using existing clinical data. Patient-level results from all completed phase 2 and 3 studies from the liraglutide clinical development programme were pooled to determine rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE): cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke. MACE were identified by querying the study database using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terms combined with serious adverse events recorded by study investigators. Broad, narrow, and custom groups of MedDRA queries were used. Candidate events from each query were independently adjudicated post hoc. In 15 studies (6638 patients; 4257 liraglutide treated), there were 114 patients with MACE identified using the broad MedDRA query. Of these, 44 were classified as serious adverse events and 39 were adjudicated as MACE. The incidence ratio for adjudicated broad/serious MACE associated with liraglutide was 0.73 (95% CI 0.38-1.41) versus all comparator drugs (metformin, glimepiride, rosiglitazone, insulin glargine, placebo), within cardiovascular safety limits defined by the United States Food & Drug Administration for diabetes therapies under current investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available