4.4 Review

Inhaled Cannabis for Chronic Neuropathic Pain: A Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages 1221-1232

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.07.009

Keywords

Cannabis; chronic pain; neuropathy; painful; polyneuropathy; meta-analysis; meta-analysis of individual patient data; Bayesian analysis; human immunodeficiency virus

Funding

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), through CTSA [UL1TR000086, TL1RR000087, KL2TR000088]
  2. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) [R01-AT005824]
  3. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) [5R01AT5824]
  4. University of California Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research
  5. NIH [5-MO1-RR00083]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic neuropathic pain, the most frequent condition affecting the peripheral nervous system, remains underdiagnosed and difficult to treat. Inhaled cannabis may alleviate chronic neuropathic pain. Our objective was to synthesize the evidence on the use of inhaled cannabis for chronic neuropathic pain. We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of individual patient data. We registered our protocol with PROSPERO CRD42011001182. We searched in Cochrane Central, PubMed, EMBASE, and AMED. We considered all randomized controlled trials investigating chronic painful neuropathy and comparing inhaled cannabis with placebo. We pooled treatment effects following a hierarchical random-effects Bayesian responder model for the population-averaged subject-specific effect. Our evidence synthesis of individual patient data from 178 participants with 405 observed responses in 5 randomized controlled trials following patients for days to weeks provides evidence that inhaled cannabis results in short-term reductions in chronic neuropathic pain for 1 in every 5 to 6 patients treated (number needed to treat = 5.6 with a Bayesian 95% credible interval ranging between 3.4 and 14). Our inferences were insensitive to model assumptions, priors, and parameter choices. We caution that the small number of studies and participants, the short follow-up, shortcomings in allocation concealment, and considerable attrition limit the conclusions that can be drawn from the review. The Bayes factor is 332, corresponding to a posterior probability of effect of 99.7%. Perspective: This novel Bayesian meta-analysis of individual patient data from 5 randomized trials suggests that inhaled cannabis may provide short-term relief for 1 in 5 to 6 patients with neuropathic pain. Pragmatic trials are needed to evaluate the long-term benefits and risks of this treatment. (C) 2015 by the American Pain Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available