4.6 Article

Prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus in the French general population: The INSTANT study

Journal

DIABETES & METABOLISM
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 25-31

Publisher

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2008.06.004

Keywords

Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Epidemiology; Treatment; Prevalence; Cross-sectional study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims. - To estimate the prevalence of diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus in the French general population. Secondary objectives were to evaluate treatments and diabetic complications. Methods. - In this cross-sectional epidemiological survey, a representative sample of the French adult Population was selected using a stratified quota method: 10.038 individuals were evaluated by a standardized face-to-face interview. The diagnosis of type 2 diabetes was determined on the basis of replies to six questions using a specific algorithm. Data were collected on risk factors, diabetes history, familial antecedents and diabetic complications. These patients also identified their treatments from an exhaustive list. Results. - The prevalence of type 2 diabetes was 5.08% in men and 4.11% in women, and rose progressively after the age of 50. Of these. 79 patients (13.4%) received no pharmacological treatment, 477 (80.9%) were taking an oral antidiabetic drug and 134 (22.7%) were taking insulin. Renal and ocular complications were reported by 6.8% and 21.0%, respectively, of the patients. Also, 10.4% had been hospitalized at some time of that year for a diabetes-related problem. The most frequently reported treatments were metformin and sulphonylureas, used by more than 50% of the patients. In addition, 380 patients (65.9%) claimed to be following a diet and 228 (39.2%) were consulting a dietitian. Conclusion. - The prevalence of treated and untreated type 2 diabetes mellitus in France was 4.57%. (C) 2008 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available