4.7 Article

Human Muscle Fiber Type-Specific Insulin Signaling: Impact of Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 485-497

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db14-0590

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Copenhagen Excellence Program for Interdisciplinary Research
  2. UNIK project Food, Fitness & Pharma for Health and Disease - Danish Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation
  3. Danish Council for Independent Research Medical Sciences
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  5. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Skeletal muscle is a heterogeneous tissue composed of different fiber types. Studies suggest that insulin-mediated glucose metabolism is different between muscle fiber types. We hypothesized that differences are due to fiber type-specific expression/regulation of insulin signaling elements and/or metabolic enzymes. Pools of type I and II fibers were prepared from biopsies of the vastus lateralis muscles from lean, obese, and type 2 diabetic subjects before and after a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Type I fibers compared with type II fibers have higher protein levels of the insulin receptor, GLUT4, hexokinase II, glycogen synthase (GS), and pyruvate dehydrogenase-El alpha (PDH-E1 alpha) and a lower protein content of Akt2, TBC1 domain family member 4 (TBC1D4), and TBC1D1. In type I fibers compared with type II fibers, the phosphorylation response to insulin was similar (TBC1D4, TBC1D1, and GS) or decreased (Akt and PDH-E1 alpha). Phosphorylation responses to insulin adjusted for protein level were not different between fiber types. Independently of fiber type, insulin signaling was similar (TBC1D1, GS, and PDH-E1 alpha) or decreased (Akt and TBC1D4) in muscle from patients with type 2 diabetes compared with lean and obese subjects. We conclude that human type I muscle fibers compared with type II fibers have a higher glucose-handling capacity but a similar sensitivity for phosphoregulation by insulin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available