4.7 Article

Exercise Prevents Fructose-Induced Hypertriglyceridemia in Healthy Young Subjects

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 62, Issue 7, Pages 2259-2265

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db12-1651

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swiss National Foundation for Science [320030_138428]
  2. Nestle SA
  3. Ajinomoto Co., Inc.,
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [320030_138428] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Excess fructose intake causes hypertriglyceridemia and hepatic insulin resistance in sedentary humans. Since exercise improves insulin sensitivity in insulin-resistant patents, we hypothesized that it would also prevent fructose-induced hypertriglyceridemia. This study was therefore designed to evaluate the effects of exercise on circulating lipids in healthy subjects fed a weight-maintenance, high-fructose diet. Eight healthy males were studied on three occasions after 4 days of 1) a diet low in fructose and no exercise (C), 2) a diet with 30% fructose and no exercise (HFr), or 3) a diet with 30% fructose and moderate aerobic exercise (HFrEx). On all three occasions, a 9-h oral [C-13]-labeled fructose loading test was performed on the fifth day to measure [C-13]palmitate in iriglyceride-rich lipoprotein (TRL)-triglycerides (TG). Compared with C, HFr significantly increased fasting glucose, total TG, TRL-TG concentrations, and apolipoprotein (apo) B48 concentrations as well as postfructose glucose, total TG, TRL-TG, and [C-13]palmitate in TRL-TG. HFrEx completely normalized fasting and postfructose TG, TRL-TG, and [C-13]palmitate concentration in TRL-TG and apoB48 concentrations. In addition, it increased lipid oxidation and plasma nonesterified fatty acid concentrations compared with HFr. These data indicate that exercise prevents the dyslipidemia induced by high fructose intake independently of energy balance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available