4.7 Article

GLP-1R Agonism Enhances Adjustable Gastric Banding in Diet-Induced Obese Rats

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 62, Issue 9, Pages 3261-3267

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db13-0117

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, Neuroendocrine Regulation of Adipocyte Metabolism [R01-DK-077975]
  2. University of Cincinnati [T32-DK-059803]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research Rubicon grant
  4. Ethicon Endo-Surgery
  5. Roche Pharmaceuticals
  6. Novo Nordisk
  7. Ablaris
  8. Zealand Pharma
  9. Pfizer
  10. Merck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bariatric procedures vary in efficacy, but overall are more effective than behavioral and pharmaceutical treatment. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass causes increased secretion of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and reduces body weight (BW) more than adjustable gastric banding (AGB), which does not trigger increased GLP-1 secretion. Since GLP-1-based drugs consistently reduce BW, we hypothesized that GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists would augment the effects of AGB. Male Long-Evans rats with diet-induced obesity received AGB implantation or sham surgery. GLP-1R agonism, cannabinoid receptor-1 (CB1-R) antagonism, or vehicle was combined with inflation to evaluate interaction between AGB and pharmacological treatments. GLP1-R agonism reduced BW in both sham and AGB rats (left uninflated) compared with vehicle-treated animals. Subsequent band inflation was ineffective in vehicle-treated rats but enhanced weight loss stimulated by GLP1-R agonism. In contrast, there was no additional BW loss when CB1-R antagonism was given with AGB. We found band inflation to trigger neural activation in areas of the nucleus of the solitary tract known to be targeted by GLP-1R agonism, offering a potential mechanism for the interaction. These data show that GLP-1R agonism, but not CB1-R antagonism, improves weight loss achieved by AGB and suggest an opportunity to optimize bariatric surgery with adjunctive pharmacotherapy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available