4.7 Article

Vegfa Protects the Glomerular Microvasculature in Diabetes

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 61, Issue 11, Pages 2958-2966

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db11-1655

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP 77756, 62931]
  2. National Institutes of Health [1 U01 DK076136-01]
  3. Terry Fox Grant [TF016002]
  4. Banting and Best Diabetes Centre at the University of Toronto
  5. Ontario Student Opportunity Trust Fund from the Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expression is increased in glomeruli in the context of diabetes. Here, we tested the hypothesis that this upregulation of VEGFA protects the glomerular microvasculature in diabetes and that therefore inhibition of VEGFA will accelerate nephropathy. To determine the role of glomerular Vegfa in the development and progression of diabetic nephropathy, we used an inducible Cre-loxP gene-targeting system that enabled genetic deletion of Vegfa selectively from glomerular podocytes of wild-type or diabetic mice. Type 1 diabetes was induced in mice using streptozotocin (STZ). We then assessed the extent of glomerular dysfunction by measuring proteinuria, glomerular pathology, and glomerular cell apoptosis. Vegfa expression increased in podocytes in the STZ model of diabetes. After 7 weeks of diabetes, diabetic mice lacking Vegfa in podocytes exhibited significantly greater proteinuria with profound glomerular scarring and increased apoptosis compared with control mice with diabetes or Vegfa deletion without diabetes. Reduced local production of glomerular Vegfa in a mouse model of type 1 diabetes promotes endothelial injury accelerating the progression of glomerular injury. These results suggest that upregulation of VEGFA in diabetic kidneys protects the micro-vasculature from injury and that reduction of VEGFA in diabetes may be harmful. Diabetes 61:2958-2966, 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available