4.7 Article

Mechanisms Underlying Antigen-Specific Tolerance of Stable and Convertible Th17 Cells During Suppression of Autoimmune Diabetes

Journal

DIABETES
Volume 61, Issue 8, Pages 2054-2065

Publisher

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/db11-1723

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Missouri
  2. National Institutes of Health [RO1-DK-65748, R21-AI-68746, RO1-NS-057194]
  3. J. Lavenia Edwards endowment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Type 1 diabetes involves both T helper (Th)1 and Th17 cells. While the mechanisms underlying the control of Thl cells are relatively well defined, those operating modulation of Th17 cells remain unknown. Moreover, given that Th17 cells are plastic and can drive disease as stable or convertible T cells, effective approaches to counter type 1 diabetes would have to alter Th17 function under both circumstances. Herein, we genetically incorporated the BDC2.5-reactive p79 mimotope into an Ig molecule, and the resulting Ig-p79 was used to investigate Th17 tolerance. Accordingly, diabetogenic BDC2.5 Th17 cells were transferred into NOD mice under convertible or stable conditions and their fate was evaluated upon induction of tolerance and disease suppression by Ig-p79. The findings show that convertible (Th17 to Th1) cells display downregulation of the chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 3 that was associated with diminished T-box transcription factor T-bet expression, retention in the spleen, and inhibition of trafficking to the pancreas. In contrast, stable Th17 cells downregulated orphan nuclear receptor ROR-gamma t but increased Fas ligand expression and died by apoptosis. Thus, the final signature transcription factor shapes the mechanism of tolerance in plastic Th17 cells. These findings suggest that effective strategies against type 1 diabetes will require regimens that could drive both mechanisms of tolerance to overcome the disease. Diabetes 61:2054-2065, 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available