4.1 Article

Neonatal Amygdala Lesions Alter Mother-Infant Interactions in Rhesus Monkeys Living in a Species-Typical Social Environment

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 8, Pages 1711-1722

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dev.21234

Keywords

development; sex difference; maternal; fear; reward; Macaca mulatta

Funding

  1. National Institute for Mental Health [MH050268]
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. Center for Behavioral Neuroscience [NSF IBN 9876754]
  4. Integrated Training in Psychobiology and Psychopathology Fellowship [NIMH T32 MH732525]
  5. Yerkes National Research Center [P51 RR00165]
  6. Office of Research Infrastructure Programs [P51OD11132]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current study examined the effects of neonatal amygdala lesions on mother-infant interactions in rhesus monkeys reared in large species-typical social groups. Focal observations of mother-infant interactions were collected in their social group for the first 12 months postpartum on infants that had received amygdala lesions (Neo-A) at 24-25 days of age and control infants. Early amygdala lesions resulted in subtle behavioral alterations. Neo-A females exhibited earlier emergence of independence from the mother than did control females, spending more time away from their mother, whereas Neo-A males did not. Also, a set of behaviors, including coo vocalizations, time in contact, and time away from the mother, accurately discriminated Neo-A females from control females, but not Neo-A and control males. Data suggest that neonatal amygdalectomy either reduced fear, therefore increasing exploration in females, or reduced the positive reward value of maternal contact. Unlike females, neonatal amygdala lesions had little measurable effects on male mother-infant interactions. The source of this sex difference is unknown. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 56: 1711-1722, 2014.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available