4.1 Article

Differences in the early cognitive development of children and great apes

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 547-573

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dev.21125

Keywords

social cognition; bonobos; chimpanzees; cognitive development; comparative psychology

Funding

  1. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  2. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0827552] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is very little research comparing great ape and human cognition developmentally. In the current studies we compared a cross-sectional sample of 2- to 4-year-old human children (n = 48) with a large sample of chimpanzees and bonobos in the same age range (n = 42, hereafter: apes) on a broad array of cognitive tasks. We then followed a group of juvenile apes (n = 44) longitudinally over 3 years to track their cognitive development in greater detail. In skills of physical cognition (space, causality, quantities), children and apes performed comparably at 2 years of age, but by 4 years of age children were more advanced (whereas apes stayed at their 2-year-old performance levels). In skills of social cognition (communication, social learning, theory of mind), children out-performed apes already at 2 years, and increased this difference even more by 4 years. Patterns of development differed more between children and apes in the social domain than the physical domain, with support for these patterns present in both the cross-sectional and longitudinal ape data sets. These results indicate key differences in the pattern and pace of cognitive development between humans and other apes, particularly in the early emergence of specific social cognitive capacities in humans. (c) 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 56: 547-573, 2014.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available