4.1 Article

Isolation and the timing of mammary gland development, gonadarche, and ovarian senescence: Implications for mammary tumor burden

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY
Volume 50, Issue 4, Pages 353-360

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dev.20295

Keywords

social isolation; mammary tumors; puberty; menopause; lifespan strategies

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [P01 AG18911] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [T32 HD007009] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIEHS NIH HHS [P50 ES012382-01] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [R37 MH41788] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study of Norway rats, we hypothesized that lifelong psychosocial experiences, social isolation or group living, trigger different developmental trajectories in the ovarian system, contributing to predisease pathways for spontaneous mammary minors. Epidemiological studies indicate that early puberty and delayed menopause are risk factors for breast cancer. To that end, we took a cross-sectional, prospective approach and examined the ovarian system at two developmental points, young adulthood and middle age. We assessed ovarian function at both points, as well as mammary gland development at puberty and mammary tumor burden in middle age. Social isolation dissociated two components of puberty; it accelerated maturation of ovarian function. while it simultaneously delayed mammary tissue development thereby increasing the exposure of developing breast parenchyma to high levels of estrogen. By mid-life, socially isolated rats had greater tumor burden despite having entered estropause prematurely, demonstrating that isolation did not increase tumorigenesis by prolonging ovarian function. These findings are discussed in the context of facultative lifespan strategies for rats born at different times of year and those living in isolation or in a large burrow community. (C) 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available