4.3 Article

Developmental Shifts in Gene Expression in the Auditory Forebrain During the Sensitive Period for Song Learning

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 7, Pages 437-450

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dneu.20719

Keywords

song learning; auditory forebrain; sensory; sensitive period; microarray

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS045264, R01 NS045264-07, R01 NS051820, NS055413] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A male zebra finch begins to learn to sing by memorizing a tutor's song during a sensitive period in juvenile development. Tutor song memorization requires molecular signaling within the auditory forebrain. Using microarray and in situ hybridizations, we tested whether the auditory forebrain at an age just before tutoring expresses a different set of genes compared with later life after song learning has ceased. Microarray analysis revealed differences in expression of thousands of genes in the male auditory forebrain at posthatch day 20 (P20) compared with adulthood. Furthermore, song playbacks had essentially no impact on gene expression in P20 auditory forebrain, but altered expression of hundreds of genes in adults. Most genes that were song-responsive in adults were expressed at constitutively high levels at P20. Using in situ hybridization with a representative sample of 44 probes, we confirmed these effects and found that birds at P20 and P45 were similar in their gene expression patterns. Additionally, eight of the probes showed male-female differences in expression. We conclude that the developing auditory forebrain is in a very different molecular state from the adult, despite its relatively mature gross morphology and electrophysiological responsiveness to song stimuli. Developmental gene expression changes may contribute to fine-tuning of cellular and molecular properties necessary for song learning. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 69: 437-450, 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available