4.3 Review

Captivity Reduces Hippocampal Volume but not Survival of New Cells in a Food-Storing Bird

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROBIOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 14, Pages 972-981

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dneu.20736

Keywords

hippocampal volume; neurogenesis; captivity; stress; learning and memory; food-storing bird

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [MH56093]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In many naturalistic studies of the hippocampus wild animals are held in captivity. To test if captivity itself affects hippocampal integrity, adult black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapilla) were caught in the fall, injected with bromodeoxyuridine to mark neurogenesis, and alternately released to the wild or held in captivity. The wild birds were recaptured after 4-6 weeks and perfused simultaneously with their captive counterparts. The hippocampus of captive birds was 23% smaller than wild birds, with no hemispheric differences in volume within groups. Between groups there was no statistically significant difference in the size of the telencephalon, or in the number and density of surviving new cells. Proximate causes of the reduced hippocampal volume could include stress, lack of exercise, diminished social interaction, or limited caching opportunity-a hippocampal-dependent activity. The results suggest the avian hippocampus-a structure essential for rapid, complex relational and spatial learning-is both plastic and sensitive, much as in mammals, including humans. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Develop Neurobiol 69: 972-981, 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available