4.5 Article

Neurodevelopmental difficulties in children with idiopathic clubfoot

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 98-+

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.13996

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Doctorial School in Health Care Science at Karolinska Institutet
  2. Promobila Foundation
  3. Stiftelsen Frimurare Barnhuset
  4. Sallskapet barnavard
  5. Sunnerdahls Handikappfond
  6. Gavofonden for Damp-forskning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo evaluate neurodevelopmental difficulties in children with idiopathic clubfoot. MethodA cross-sectional study of 106 children (29 females, 77 males; aged 8-10y) with idiopathic clubfoot and 109 age-, sex-, and residential area-parallelized children from the general population. Neurodevelopmental difficulties were assessed using the parent-report Five to Fifteen (FTF) questionnaire. Group differences were analysed for FTF domains, subdomains, and items. The 90th centile cut-off of the general population on FTF and the parent-based disease-specific instrument (DSI) were used to evaluate clinical relevance of neurodevelopmental symptoms in idiopathic clubfoot. ResultsModest group differences were found for several FTF domains (motor skills, perception, and language) and subdomains (gross and fine motor skills, relation in space, comprehensive and expressive language skills). Thirty-one per cent of the children with idiopathic clubfoot scored in the clinically significant range on 2 or more FTF domains. DSI scores were lower in this subgroup. InterpretationFindings indicate a moderate and selective increase of neurodevelopmental difficulties in children with idiopathic clubfoot as a whole, especially in the areas of motor skills, perception, and language. Idiopathic clubfoot with marked neurodevelopmental symptoms are associated with less satisfaction of the clubfoot treatment. Our results recommend awareness of neurodevelopmental difficulties in the assessment and treatment of idiopathic clubfoot.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available