4.5 Article

Predicting functional communication ability in children with cerebral palsy at school entry

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages 279-285

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12631

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [569605]
  2. NHMRC [1037220]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo explore the value of demographic, environmental, and early clinical characteristics in predicting functional communication in children with cerebral palsy (CP) at school entry. MethodData are from an Australian prospective longitudinal study of children with CP. Children assessed at 18 to 24 and 48 to 60months corrected age were included in the study. Functional communication was classified at 48 to 60months using the Communication Function Classification System (CFCS). Predictive variables included communication skills at 18 to 24months, evaluated using the Communication and Symbolic Behavioural Scales Developmental Profile (CSBS-DP) Infant-Toddler Checklist. Early Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), Manual Ability Classification System, and motor type and distribution were evaluated by two physiotherapists. Demographic and comorbid variables were obtained through parent interview with a paediatrician or rehabilitation specialist. ResultsA total of 114 children (76 males, 38 females) were included in the study. At 18 to 24months the mean CSBS-DP was 84.9 (SD 19.0). The CFCS distribution at 48 to 60months was I=36(32%), II=25(22%), III=20(18%), IV=19(17%), and V=14(12%). In multivariable regression analysis, only CSBS-DP (p<0.01) and GMFCS (p<0.01) at 18 to 24months were predictors of functional communication at school entry. InterpretationBody structure and function and not environmental factors impact functional communication at school entry in children with CP. This provides valuable guidance for early screening, parent education, and future planning of intervention programs to improve functional communication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available