4.5 Article

Cortical speech sound differentiation in the neonatal intensive care unit predicts cognitive and language development in the first 2years of life

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 9, Pages 834-839

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/dmcn.12191

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Turner-Hazinski Award
  2. Vanderbilt Department of Pediatrics
  3. Gerber Foundation
  4. Vanderbilt GCRC [M01 RR 000095]
  5. NICHD [P30HD15052]
  6. Vanderbilt CTSA [1 UL1 RR024975]
  7. [1R21 ES013730]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AIM Neurodevelopmental delay in childhood is common in infants born preterm, but is difficult to predict before infants leave the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We hypothesized that event-related potential (ERP) methodology characterizing the cortical differentiation of speech sounds in hospitalized infants would predict cognitive and language outcomes during early childhood. METHODS We conducted a prospective study of 57 infants in NICU (34 male, gestational age at birth 24-40wks), quantifying the amplitude of ERP responses to speech sounds before discharge (median gestational age 37.1wks), followed by standardized neurodevelopmental assessments at 12 months and 24 months. Analyses were performed using ordinary least squares linear regression. RESULTS Overall validity of constructs using all ERP variables, as well as sex, maternal education, gestational age, and age at ERP, was good and allowed significant prediction of cognitive and communication outcomes at 12 months and 24 months (R-2=22-42%; p<0.05). Quantitative models incorporating specific ERPs, gestational age, and age at ERP explained a large proportion of the variance in cognition and receptive language on the Bayley Scales of Infant Development at 24 months (R-2>50%; p<0.05). INTERPRETATION This study establishes ERP methodology as a valuable research tool to quantitatively assess cortical function in the NICU and to predict meaningful outcomes in early childhood.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available