4.5 Article

Local bone quality affects the outcome of prosthetic total knee arthroplasty

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 240-248

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jor.23003

Keywords

micro-computed tomography; bone mineral density; osteoarthritis; osteoporosis; implants

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC-100-2325-B-002-060]
  2. National Research Program, Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [MOST-103-2325-B-002-033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Osteoporosis and osteoarthritis commonly coexist in the elderly. In patients undergoing prosthetic total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the bone quality around the knee joint may affect the safety of prosthetic implantation and consequently satisfaction with the surgical outcome. We recruited 50 postmenopausal women undergoing TKA for primary osteoarthritis; 43 completed the study protocol. The bone quality parameters of the operated knee, including bone mineral density assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and microarchitecture variables assessed using micro-computed tomography, were determined. Surgical outcomes were assessed according to immediate (<1week) postoperative pain quantified using the visual analog scale and knee function quantified using the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at 2 and 6months postoperatively. The influence of bone quality parameters on surgical outcomes was analyzed using simple and multiple regression analyses. Volumetric bone mineral density (R-2=0.187-0.234, p<0.01), the structural model index (R-2=0.103-0.181, p<0.05), and trabecular separation (R-2=0.289-0.424, p<0.05) were significantly associated with postoperative pain and improvement according to the KOOS. In conclusion, local bone quality, including mineral content and microarchitecture, affects the surgical outcome of TKA. (c) 2015 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 34:240-248, 2016.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available