4.4 Article

Sonic hedgehog-Expressing Basal Cells Are General Post-Mitotic Precursors of Functional Taste Receptor Cells

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS
Volume 243, Issue 10, Pages 1286-1297

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/DVDY.24121

Keywords

mouse; molecular genetics; lineage tracing; tamoxifen; Cre recombinase; Shh; taste bud; cell lineage; regeneration

Funding

  1. NIH/NIDCD [R01 DC008373, R01 DC012383]
  2. ARRA [DC008373-03S1]
  3. Rocky Mountain Taste and Smell Center [P30 DC003947]
  4. MEXT KAKENHI [23592742]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23592742] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Taste buds contain similar to 60 elongate cells and several basal cells. Elongate cells comprise three functional taste cell types: I, glial cells; II, bitter/sweet/umami receptor cells; and III, sour detectors. Although taste cells are continuously renewed, lineage relationships among cell types are ill-defined. Basal cells have been proposed as taste bud stem cells, a subset of which express Sonic hedgehog (Shh). However, Shh1 basal cells turn over rapidly suggesting that Shh1 cells are post-mitotic precursors of some or all taste cell types. Results: To fate map Shh-expressing cells, mice carrying ShhCreER(T2) and a high (CAG-CAT-EGFP) or low (R26RLacZ) efficiency reporter allele were given tamoxifen to activate Cre in Shh1 cells. Using R26RLacZ, lineage-labeled cells occur singly within buds, supporting a post-mitotic state for Shh1 cells. Using either reporter, we show that Shh1 cells differentiate into all three taste cell types, in proportions reflecting cell type ratios in taste buds (I > II > III). Conclusions: Shh1 cells are not stem cells, but are post-mitotic, immediate precursors of taste cells. Shh1 cells differentiate into each of the three taste cell types, and the choice of a specific taste cell fate is regulated to maintain the proper ratio within buds. (C) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available