4.4 Article

Coronary Endothelial Proliferation and Morphogenesis Are Regulated by a VEGF-Mediated Pathway

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL DYNAMICS
Volume 238, Issue 2, Pages 423-430

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.21847

Keywords

coronary development; VEGF signaling system; endothelial tube formation

Funding

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL086856, R01 HL086856-01A1, R01 HL086856-02] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R25 GM066526, R25 GM076277] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Though development of the coronary vasculature is a critical event during embryogenesis, the molecular mechanisms that regulate its formation are not well characterized. Two unique approaches were used to investigate interactions between cardiac myocytes and proepicardial (PE) cells, which are the coronary anlagen. One of these experimental approaches used a 3-D collagen scaffold system on which specific cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions were studied. The other approach used a whole heart culture system that allowed for the analysis of epicardial to mesenchymal transformation (EMT). The VEGF signaling system has been implicated previously as an important regulator of coronary development. Our results demonstrated that a specific isoform of VEGF-A, VEGF(164), increased PE-derived endothelial cell proliferation and also increased EMT. However, VEGF-stimulated endothelial cells did not robustly coalesce into endothelial tubes as they did when cocultured with cardiac myocytes. Interestingly, blocking VEGF signaling via flk-1 inhibition reduced endothelial tube formation despite the presence of cardiac myocytes. These results indicate that VEGF signaling is complex during coronary development and that combinatorial signaling by other VEGF-A isoforms or other flk-1-binding VEGFs are likely to regulate endothelial tube formation. Developmental Dynamics 238:423-430, 2009. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available