4.7 Article

Cdx and Hox Genes Differentially Regulate Posterior Axial Growth in Mammalian Embryos

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL CELL
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages 516-526

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.08.010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Dutch Netherlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Aard- an Levenswetenschappen
  2. European Community Framework 6 Programme Network of Excellence Cells into Organs
  3. Dutch Bsik programme Stem Cells into Development and disease
  4. Association for International Cancer Research
  5. European Union
  6. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia and Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional [PTDC/BIA-BCM/71619/2006]
  7. Centro de Biologia do Desenvolvimento [POCTI-ISFL-4-664]
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BIA-BCM/71619/2006] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hox and Cdx transcription factors regulate embryonic positional identities. Cdx mutant mice display posterior body truncations of the axial skeleton, neuraxis, and caudal urorectal structures. We show that trunk Hox genes stimulate axial extension, as they can largely rescue these Cdx mutant phenotypes. Conversely, posterior (paralog group 13) Hox genes can prematurely arrest posterior axial growth when precociously expressed. Our data suggest that the transition from trunk to tail Hox gene expression successively regulates the construction and termination of axial structures in the mouse embryo. Thus, Hox genes seem to differentially orchestrate posterior expansion of embryonic tissues during axial morphogenesis as an integral part of their function in specifying head-to-tail identity. In addition, we present evidence that Cdx and Hox transcription factors exert these effects by controlling Writ signaling. Concomitant regulation of Cyp26a1 expression, restraining retinoic acid signaling away from the posterior growth zone, may likewise play a role in timing the trunk-tail transition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available