4.4 Article

Lens development depends on a pair of highly conserved Sox21 regulatory elements

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 365, Issue 1, Pages 310-318

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2012.02.025

Keywords

Sox21; Conserved non-coding elements; Lens; Zebrafish; Enhancer

Funding

  1. MRC Institute [U117597141]
  2. MRC [MC_U117597141] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U117597141] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Highly conserved non-coding elements (CNEs) linked to genes involved in embryonic development have been hypothesised to correspond to cis-regulatory modules due to their ability to induce tissue-specific expression patterns. However, attempts to prove their requirement for normal development or for the correct expression of the genes they are associated with have yielded conflicting results. Here, we show that CNEs at the vertebrate Sox21 locus are crucial for Sox21 expression in the embryonic lens and that loss of Sox21 function interferes with normal lens development. Using different expression assays in zebrafish we find that two CNEs linked to Sox21 in all vertebrates contain lens enhancers and that their removal from a reporter BAC abolishes lens expression. Furthermore inhibition of Sox21 function after the injection of a sox21b morpholino into zebrafish leads to defects in lens development These findings identify a direct link between sequence conservation and genomic function of regulatory sequences. In addition to this we provide evidence that putative Sox binding sites in one of the CNEs are essential for induction of lens expression as well as enhancer function in the CNS. Our results show that CNEs identified in pufferfish-mammal whole-genome comparisons are crucial developmental enhancers and hence essential components of gene regulatory networks underlying vertebrate embryogenesis. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available