4.4 Article

Developmental transition of touch response from slow muscle-mediated coilings to fast muscle-mediated burst swimming in zebrafish

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 355, Issue 2, Pages 194-204

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.04.027

Keywords

Zebrafish; Touch response; Muscle; Flightless I homolog; Development; Swimming

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Nakajima Foundation
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Human Frontier Science Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is well known that slow and fast muscles are used for long-term sustained movement and short bursts of activity, respectively, in adult animal behaviors. However, the contribution of the slow and fast muscles in early animal movement has not been thoroughly explored. In wild-type zebrafish embryos, tactile stimulation induces coilings consisting of 1-3 alternating contractions of the trunk and tail at 24 hours postfertilization (hpf) and burst swimming at 48 hpf. But, embryos defective in flightless I homolog (flii), which encodes for an actin-regulating protein, exhibit normal coilings at 24 hpf that is followed by significantly slower burst swimming at 48 hpf. Interestingly, actin fibers are disorganized in mutant fast muscle but not in mutant slow muscle, suggesting that slower swimming at 48 hpf is attributable to defects of the fast muscle tissue. In fact, perturbation of the fast muscle contractions by eliminating Ca(2+) release only in fast muscle resulted in normal coilings at 24 hpf and slower burst swimming at 48 hpf, just as flu mutants exhibited. In contrast, specific inactivation of slow muscle by knockdown of the slow muscle myosin genes led to complete loss of coilings at 24 hpf, although normal burst swimming was retained by 48 hpf. These findings indicate that coilings at 24 hpf is mediated by slow muscle only, whereas burst swimming at 48 hpf is executed primarily by fast muscle. It is consistent with the fact that differentiation of fast muscle follows that of slow muscle. This is the first direct demonstration that slow and fast muscles have distinct physiologically relevant contribution in early motor development at different stages. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available