4.4 Article

Differential activation of canonical Wnt signaling determines cranial sutures fate: A novel mechanism for sagittal suture craniosynostosis

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 344, Issue 2, Pages 922-940

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.06.009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Hagey Family Program
  2. Oak Foundation
  3. NIH [R21DE019274]
  4. German Research Foundation [DFG BE 4169/1-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Premature closure of cranial sutures, which serve as growth centers for the skull vault, result in craniosynostosis. In the mouse posterior frontal (PF) suture closes by endochondral ossification, whereas sagittal (SAG) remain patent life time, although both are neural crest tissue derived. We therefore, investigated why cranial sutures of same tissue origin adopt a different fate. We demonstrated that closure of the PF suture is tightly regulated by canonical Wnt signaling, whereas patency of the SAG suture is achieved by constantly activated canonical Wnt signaling. Importantly, the fate of PF and SAG sutures can be reversed by manipulating Wnt signaling. Continuous activation of canonical Wnt signaling in the PF suture inhibits endochondral ossification and therefore, suture closure, In contrast, inhibition of canonical Wnt signaling in the SAG suture, upon treatment with Wnt antagonists results in endochondral ossification and suture closure. Thus, inhibition of canonical Wnt signaling in the SAG suture phenocopies craniosynostosis. Moreover, mice haploinsufficient for Twist1, a target gene of canonical Wnt signaling which inhibits chondrogenesis, have sagittal craniosynostosis. We propose that regulation of canonical Wnt signaling is of crucial importance during the physiological patterning of PF and SAG sutures. Importantly, dysregulation of this pathway may lead to craniosynostosis. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available