4.4 Article

Loss of inhibin alpha uncouples oocyte-granulosa cell dynamics and disrupts postnatal folliculogenesis

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 334, Issue 2, Pages 458-467

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.08.001

Keywords

Inhibin; Activin; Folliculogenesis; Oocyte; Follicle; Prepubertal mouse

Funding

  1. Burroughs Wellcome Career Award in Biomedical Sciences
  2. Dan L. Duncan Center
  3. Caroline Wiess Law Fund for Molecular Medicine
  4. L.E. and Josephine S. Gordy Memorial Cancer Research Fund
  5. NIH [CA60651]
  6. NICHD/NIH [U541146 HD28934]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Targeted disruption of the inhibin alpha gene (Inha(-/-)) in mice results in an ovarian phenotype of granulosa cell tumors that renders the animals infertile. Little is known about the reproductive defects prior to tumor development. Here, we report novel data on early follicle dynamics in Inha(-/-) mice, which demonstrate that inhibin alpha has important consequences upon follicle development. Morphological changes in both germ and somatic cells were evident in postnatal day 12 ovaries, with Inha(-/-) mice exhibiting numerous multilayered follicles that were far more advanced than those observed in age-matched controls. These changes were accompanied by alterations in follicle dynamics such that Inha(-/-) ovaries had fewer follicles in the resting pool and more committed in the growth phase. Absence of inhibin alpha resulted in advanced follicular maturation as marked by premature loss of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in secondary follicles. Additionally, gene expression analysis revealed changes in factors known to be vital for oocyte and follicle development. Together, these data provide key evidence to suggest that regulation of the inhibin/activin system is essential for early folliculogenesis in the prepubertal mouse ovary. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available