4.4 Article

Loss of Fgfr2 leads to partial XY sex reversal

Journal

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY
Volume 314, Issue 1, Pages 71-83

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.11.010

Keywords

sex determination; XY sex reversal; SOX9; FGFR2; FGF9; PGDS; FGF signalling; ovotestis; disorders of sexual development; testis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In mammals, sex is determined in the bipotential embryonic gonad by a balanced network of gene actions which when altered causes disorders of sexual development (DSD, formerly known as intersex). In the XY gonad, presumptive Sertoli cells begin to differentiate when SRY upregulates SOX9, which in turn activates FGF9 and PGDS to maintain its own expression. This study identifies a new and essential component of FGF signaling in sex determination. Fgfr2 mutant XY mice on a mixed 129/C57BL6 genetic background had either normal testes, or developed ovotestes, with predominantly testicular tissue. However, backcrossing to C57BL6 mice resulted in a wide range of gonadal phenotypes, from hypoplastic testes to ovotestes with predominantly ovarian tissue, similar to Fgf9 knockout mice. Since typical male-specific FGF9-binding to the coelomic epithelium was abolished in Fgfr2 mutant XY gonads, these results suggest that FGFR2 acts as the receptor for FGF9. Pgds and SOX9 remained expressed within the testicular portions of Fgfr2 mutant ovotestes, suggesting that the Prostaglandin pathway acts independently of FGFR2 to maintain SOX9 expression. We could further demonstrate that double-heterozygous Fgfr2/Sox9 knockout mice developed ovotestes, demonstrating that both Fgfr2 and Sox9 can act as modifier intersex genes in the heterozygous state. In summary, we provide evidence that FGFR2 is important for male sex determination in mice, thereby rendering human FGFR2 a candidate gene for unsolved DSD cases such as 10q26 deletions. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available