4.7 Article

PLK-1 asymmetry contributes to asynchronous cell division of C. elegans embryos

Journal

DEVELOPMENT
Volume 135, Issue 7, Pages 1303-1313

Publisher

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/dev.019075

Keywords

C. elegans; embryo; polo-like kinase; asymmetry; cell division timing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acquisition of lineage-specific cell cycle duration is an important feature of metazoan development. In Caenorhabditis elegans, differences in cell cycle duration are already apparent in two-cell stage embryos, when the larger anterior blastomere AB divides before the smaller posterior blastomere P-1. This time difference is under the control of anterior-posterior ( A-P) polarity cues set by the PAR proteins. The mechanisms by which these cues regulate the cell cycle machinery differentially in AB and P-1 are incompletely understood. Previous work established that retardation of P-1 cell division is due in part to preferential activation of an ATL-1/CHK-1 dependent checkpoint in P-1, but how the remaining time difference is controlled is not known. Here, we establish that differential timing relies also on a mechanism that promotes mitosis onset preferentially in AB. The polo-like kinase PLK-1, a positive regulator of mitotic entry, is distributed in an asymmetric manner in two-cell stage embryos, with more protein present in AB than in P-1. We find that PLK-1 asymmetry is regulated by A-P polarity cues through preferential protein retention in the embryo anterior. Importantly, mild inactivation of plk-1 by RNAi delays entry into mitosis in P-1, but not in AB, in a manner that is independent of ATL-1/CHK-1. Together, our findings support a model in which differential timing of mitotic entry in C. elegans embryos relies on two complementary mechanisms: ATL-1/CHK-1-dependent preferential retardation in P-1 and PLK-1-dependent preferential promotion in AB, which together couple polarity cues and cell cycle progression during early development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available