4.3 Article

Treatment of coal gasification wastewater by a two-phase anaerobic digestion

Journal

DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
Volume 54, Issue 3, Pages 598-608

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2014.884474

Keywords

Phenol; Coal gasification wastewater; Two-phase anaerobic digestion; Two-stage anaerobic digestion

Funding

  1. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology [2013DX10]
  2. Sino-Dutch Research Program [zhmhgfs2011-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coal gasification wastewater (CGW) is a refractory wastewater, whose anaerobic treatment has been a severe problem due to its toxicity and poor biodegradability. Using a two-stage anaerobic digestion as a control, the two-phase anaerobic digestion of real CGW was investigated. After 210 d of operation, the maximum removal efficiencies of COD and total phenols (TP) reached 50-60% and 55-60%, respectively, in the two-phase anaerobic digestion at total hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 48 h; the corresponding efficiencies were at low levels of 40-45% and 42-50%, respectively, in the two-stage anaerobic digestion. COD and TP removal efficiencies increased to 69.7 and 65.9%, when 50% of the effluent was recirculated to the hydrolytic acidogenic reactor. Phenol utilization rate and specific methanogenic activity (SMA) were decreased to 57.6 mg phenol/(gVSS d) and 394.3 mg COD-CH4/(gVSS d), respectively, as the HRT in the hydrolytic acidogenic reactor was reduced to 18 h. After the two-phase anaerobic digestion, the wastewater concentrations of the aerobic effluent COD could reach below 150 mg/l when compared to 237.2 mg/l if two-stage anaerobic digestion was done and 328.5 mg/l if sole aerobic pretreatment was done. The results suggested that the two-phase anaerobic digestion improved significantly both anaerobic and aerobic biodegradation of real CGW.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available