4.2 Article

Evaluation of a Novel Artificial Tear in the Prevention and Treatment of Dry Eye in an Animal Model

Journal

JOURNAL OF OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages 525-530

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jop.2015.0042

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA
  2. Allergan, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate effects of a novel multi-ingredient artificial tear formulation containing carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) and hyaluronic acid (HA) in a murine dry eye model. Methods: Dry eye was induced in mice (C57BL/6) using an intelligently controlled environmental system (ICES). CMC+HA (Optive Fusion), CMC-only (Refresh Tears((R))), and HA-only (Hycosan((R))) artificial tears and control phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were administered 4 times daily and compared with no treatment (n=64 eyes per group). During regimen 1 (prevention regimen), mice were administered artificial tears or PBS for 14 days (starting day 0) while they were exposed to ICES, and assessed on days 0 and 14. During regimen 2 (treatment regimen), mice exposed to ICES for 14 days with no intervention were administered artificial tears or PBS for 14 days (starting day 14) while continuing exposure to ICES, and assessed on days 0, 14, and 28. Corneal fluorescein staining and conjunctival goblet cell density were measured. Results: Artificial tear-treated mice had significantly better outcomes than control groups on corneal staining and goblet cell density (P<0.01). Mice administered CMC+HA also showed significantly lower corneal fluorescein staining and higher goblet cell density, compared with CMC (P<0.01) and HA (P<0.05) in both regimens 1 and 2. Conclusions: The artificial tear formulation containing CMC and HA was effective in preventing and treating environmentally induced dry eye. Improvements observed for corneal fluorescein staining and conjunctival goblet cell retention suggest that this combination may be a viable treatment option for dry eye disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available