4.3 Article

A statistical approach to analyze factors affecting silt density index

Journal

DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
Volume 45, Issue 1-3, Pages 276-283

Publisher

DESALINATION PUBL
DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2012.692040

Keywords

Silt density index (SDI); Dissolved organic matter; Turbidity; Reverse osmosis (RO); Fouling

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2011-0014006]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0014006] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Silt Density Index (SDI) has been used as the most popular fouling index for reverse osmosis (RO) feed water to select a proper pretreatment option for RO processes. However, SDI lacks the fundamental consideration of RO membrane fouling, because SDI is supposed to be only sensitive to particles larger than 0.45 mu m in diameter while fine particles (which can pass through a 0.45 mu m filter) and dissolved organic matters can be potent foulants for RO processes. Our study started from the suspected performance of SDI based on its lack of the fundamental basis. Various sources of SDI data from nine literatures were collected and analyzed with turbidity and dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Interestingly, the result of our study shows that SDI can express the amount of particulate and organic fouling together. SDI can be described as a function of turbidity, DOC, and a categorical binary variable, M, for pretreatment type (i.e., M = 1 for membrane filtration and M = 0 for other methods). SDI increases if either of turbidity or DOC becomes higher and membrane filtration is not used as a pretreatment option according to the multiple linear regression method using various data sources. Therefore, our study concludes that SDI can measure the potential of fouling effectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available