4.7 Article

Limiting thickness of polyamide-polysulfone thin-film-composite nanofiltration membrane

Journal

DESALINATION
Volume 346, Issue -, Pages 19-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.05.007

Keywords

Thin-film-composite; Nanofiltration; Polyamide; Thickness variation; Performance

Funding

  1. Council of Scientific & Industrial Research [9/1/CS/CSMCRI(1)/2012-13-PPD]
  2. Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India [29/INCGW-05/2010-RD/2997-2006]
  3. Analytical Discipline & Centralized Instrument Facility, CSIR-CSMCRI, Bhavnagar

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A systematic study was carried out to explore limiting thickness of the state-of-the-art nanofiltration membrane. The interfacial polymerization between aqueous solution of piperazine and organic solution of trimesoyl chloride over polysulfone ultrafiltration supports of average pore size 20, 100 and 200 nm, respectively had been performed to vary the membrane thickness and properties. The prepared membranes were designated as TFC-12, TFC-15 and TFC-24, respectively. Influence of the supports on membrane thickness, surface roughness and potential was observed by SEM, AFM, ATR-IR and zeta-potential measurements. The membrane thickness and surface roughness were found in increasing order of TFC-12 < TFC-15 < TFC-24. When tested for desalination of brackish water of 2000 ppm NaCI or 1000 ppm MgSO4 at 150 psig, TFC-24 exhibited the highest salt rejection efficiency but the least flux of 26 l center dot m(-2)center dot h(-1) while the flux was enhanced to about 94 l center dot m(-2)center dot h(-1) but with lesser salt rejection for TFC-12 which was in agreement with the differences in membrane thickness and roughness. The results indicated a trade-off performance relationship for the nanoffitration membranes that the membranes of high-flux with moderate selectivity or high-selectivity with moderate flux could be prepared by varying supports from a same preparation condition. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available