4.1 Article

Self-reported Occupational Exposures Relevant for Cancer among 28,000 Offshore Oil Industry Workers Employed between 1965 and 1999

Journal

JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HYGIENE
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages 458-468

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2014.989358

Keywords

petroleum industry; inhalation; carcinogens; health hazards; skin contact

Funding

  1. Research Council of Norway's PETROMAKS program
  2. Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway
  3. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to examine self-reported frequency of occupational exposure reported by 28,000 Norwegian offshore oil workers in a 1998 survey. Predictors of self-reported exposure frequency were identified to aid future refinements of an expert-based job-exposure-time matrix (JEM). We focus here on reported frequencies for skin contact with oil and diesel; exposure to oil vapor from shaker, to exhaust fumes, vapor from mixing chemicals used for drilling, natural gas, chemicals used for water injection and processing, and to solvent vapor. Exposure frequency was reported by participants as the exposed proportion of the work shift, defined by six categories, in their current or last position offshore (between 1965 and 1999). Binary Poisson regression models with robust variance were used to examine the probabilities of reporting frequent exposure (>= 1/4 vs. < 1/4 of work shift) according to main activity, time period, supervisory position, type of company, type of installation, work schedule, and education. Holding a non-supervisory position, working shifts, being employed in the early period of the offshore industry, and having only compulsory education increased the probability of reporting frequent exposure. The identified predictors and group-level patterns may aid future refinement of the JEM previously developed for the present cohort.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available