4.7 Article

Structural and performance properties of UV-assisted TiO2 deposited nano-composite PVDF/SPES membranes

Journal

DESALINATION
Volume 285, Issue -, Pages 31-38

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.09.026

Keywords

TiO2 deposited PVDF/SPES membrane; Nano-composite; UV irradiation; Antifouling; Antibacterial

Funding

  1. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF) [88002471]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this research, the surface of poly (vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF)/sulfonated polyethersulfone (SPES) blend membrane prepared via immersion precipitation was modified by depositing of TiO2 nano-particles followed by UV irradiation to activate their photocatalytic property. The membranes were characterized by FTIR, SEM, AFM, contact angle, dead end filtration (pure water flux and BSA solution flux), antifouling analysis and antibacterial activity. The FTIR spectrum confirmed the presence of OH functional groups on the PVDF/SPES membrane structure, which was the key factor for deposition, and self-assembly of TiO2 nanoparticles on the membrane surface. The SEM and AFM images indicated that the TiO2 nanoparticles were deposited on the PVDF/SPES membrane. The contact angle measurements showed that the hydrophilicity of PVDF/SPES membrane was strongly improved by TiO2 deposition and UV irradiation. The filtration results indicated that the initial flux of TiO2 deposited PVDF/SPES membranes was lower than the initial flux of neat PVDF/SPES membrane. However, the former membranes showed lower flux decline compared to the neat PVDF/SPES membrane. The BSA rejection of modified membranes was improved. The fouling analysis demonstrated that the TiO2 deposited PVDF/SPES membranes showed the fewer tendencies to fouling. The results of antibacterial study showed that the UV irradiated TiO2 deposited PVDF/SPF,S membranes possess high antibacterial property. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available