4.7 Article

Using nanocomposite materials technology to understand and control reverse osmosis membrane compaction

Journal

DESALINATION
Volume 261, Issue 3, Pages 255-263

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.06.008

Keywords

Reverse osmosis; Desalination; Compaction; Interfacial polymerization; Phase inversion; Nanocomposite

Funding

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-C1-018-02]
  2. UCLA California NanoSystems Institute (CNSI)
  3. NanoH2O Inc.
  4. UCLA
  5. Environmental Engineers for the Future funding program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Composite reverse osmosis (RO) membranes were formed by interfacial polymerization of polyamide thin films over pure polysulfone and nanocomposite-polysulfone support membranes. Nanocomposite support membranes were formed from amorphous non-porous silica and crystalline microporous zeolite nanoparticles. For each hand-cast membrane, water flux and NaCl rejection were monitored over time at two different applied pressures. Nanocomposite-polysulfone supported RO membranes generally had higher initial permeability and experienced less flux decline due to compaction than pure polysulfone supported membranes. In addition, observed salt rejection tended to increase as flux declined from compaction. Cross-sectional SEM images verified significant reduction in thickness of pure polysulfone supports, whereas nanocomposites better resisted compaction due to enhanced mechanical stability imparted by the nanoparticles. A conceptual model was proposed to explain the mechanistic relationship between support membrane compaction and observed changes in water flux and salt rejection. As the support membrane compacts, skin layer pore constriction increased the effective path length for diffusion through the composite membranes, which reduced both water and salt permeability identically. However, experimental salt permeability tended to decline to a greater extent than water permeability; hence, the observed changes in flux and rejection might also be related to structural changes in the polyamide thin film. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available