4.7 Article

Chromate removal from wastewater using micellar enhanced crossflow filtration: Effect of transmembrane pressure and crossflow velocity

Journal

DESALINATION
Volume 249, Issue 3, Pages 1356-1364

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.06.023

Keywords

Crossflow ultrafiltration; Surfactant enhanced filtration; Chromate removal; Wastewater treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Removal of chromate from wastewater was investigated using Micellar Enhanced Crossflow Microfiltration Technique (MEMF) with cationic surfactant, cetyltrimetylammoniumbromide (CTAB). The variation of chromate, surfactant rejections and permeate flux with time were measured at two different CTAB concentrations as a function of transmembrane pressure drop (Delta P) and crossflow velocity, while CTAB/chromate, membrane pore size, temperature and pH of the feed solution was kept constant. For low CTAB concentration, it was observed that the efficiencies of chromate and surfactant removal increased with increasing Delta P, but decreased with increasing crossflow velocities. It was also observed that the effects of crossflow velocities and Delta Ps on the rejections decreased for high CTAB concentration. It was found that fouling of the membrane by surfactant is very rapid at low crossflow velocity and high Delta Ps at low CTAB concentration. As a result of this case, both transient permeate flux (1) and steady state permeate flux (J*) decreased with decreasing crossflow velocity and increasing Delta P for both CTAB concentration. Unlike, modified fouling index (MFI) values increase with decreasing crossflow velocity and increasing Delta P. It was also observed that the effect of surfactant concentration in the 150, 200, and 250 kPa pressure and 3, 4, and 5 m/s crossflow velocity intervals dominates at high surfactant concentration. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available