4.3 Article

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography Imaging in the Management of Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study

Journal

DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY
Volume 39, Issue 9, Pages 1323-1333

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/dsu.12246

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is among the deadliest of cutaneous malignancies. A lack of consensus evaluation and treatment guidelines has hindered management of this disease. The utility of simultaneous positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) has been demonstrated for a variety of tumors yet remains underinvestigated for MCC. Objectives To report the value of fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT imaging in the initial staging and ongoing management of individuals with MCC and to determine whether any patient or tumor characteristics may predict when PET/CT is more likely to have greater influence on medical decision-making. Materials and Methods A single-institution retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients diagnosed with MCC who underwent FDG-PET/CT scanning from 2007 to 2010. The outcome of each of these studies was evaluated as to the influence on patient staging and management. Patient clinical information and information on gross and microscopic tumor characteristics were collected and analyzed. Results Twenty patients underwent 39 PET/CT scans. Results of PET/CT imaging revealed previously unknown information related to MCC in four (20%) patients, leading to changes in management in three of these four cases. Three previously unknown neoplasms were detected. Conclusion Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography is a valuable tool for initial staging and to assess response to therapy of patients diagnosed with MCC. Larger prospective studies would be required to establish the optimal timing for this imaging modality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available