4.6 Article

THE LATENT STRUCTURE AND COMORBIDITY PATTERNS OF GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER AND MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER: A NATIONAL STUDY

Journal

DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 214-222

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/da.22139

Keywords

anxiety; anxiety disorders; epidemiology; mood disorders; factor analysis; nosology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThere is controversy on whether generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive disorder (MDD) constitute the same or separate disorders. This study sought to examine the factor structure of the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria of GAD and MDD and the patterns of comorbidity associated with both disorders. MethodsData were drawn from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related conditions (NESARC), a representative sample of the adult general population in the United States (N = 43,093). Sociodemographic and psychiatric comorbidity correlates of GAD, MDD, and co-occurring GAD-MDD were obtained. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for GAD and MDD were conducted, followed by a Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) model to examine the invariance of the model across several sociodemographic covariates. ResultsA bifactor model with one general factor underlying all the MDD and GAD diagnostic criteria and another factor with large loadings only for the GAD criteria best represented the latent structure. This model showed excellent fit indices (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 1.00, RMSEA < 0.02), and a high degree of invariance across sociodemographic covariates. The comorbidity patterns of individuals with MDD only (n = 4,885), GAD only (n = 947) and GAD-MDD (n = 810) were clearly distinguishable. ConclusionsThe latent structure of the diagnostic criteria of MDD and GAD and their comorbidity patterns suggests that GAD and MDD are closely related but different nosological entities, with distinct latent structures, clinical manifestations, and patterns of comorbidity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available