4.3 Article

Chemical genoprotection: reducing biological damage to as low as reasonably achievable levels

Journal

DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 310-314

Publisher

BRITISH INST RADIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/95408354

Keywords

radiation effects; antimutagenic agents; antioxidant; micronuclei

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology denominated SENIFOOD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the antioxidant substances present in the human diet with an antimutagenic protective capacity against genotoxic damage induced by exposure to X-rays in an attempt to reduce biological damage to as low a level as reasonably possible. Methods: Ten compounds were assessed using the lymphocyte cytokinesis-block micronucleus (MN) cytome test. The compounds studied were added to human blood at 25 mu M 5 min before exposure to irradiation by 2 Gy of X-rays. Results: The protective capacity of the antioxidant substances assessed was from highest to lowest according to the frequency of the MN generated by X-ray exposure: rosmarinic acid 5 carnosic acid = delta-tocopherol = L-acid ascorbic = apigenin = amifostine (P < 0.001) > green tea extract = diosmine = rutin = dimetylsulfoxide (P < 0.05) > irradiated control. The reduction in genotoxic damage with the radiation doses administered reached 58%, which represents a significant reduction in X-ray-induced chromosomal damage (P < 0.001). This degree of protection is greater than that obtained with amifostine, a radioprotective compound used in radiotherapy and which is characterised by its high toxicity. Conclusion: Several antioxidant substances, common components of the human diet and lacking toxicity, offer protection from the biological harm induced by ionizing radiation. Administering these protective substances to patients before radiological exploration should be considered, even in the case of small radiation doses and regardless of the biological damage expected. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2011) 40, 310-314. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/95408354

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available