4.6 Article

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of molars with thin-walled prosthetic crowns made of various materials

Journal

DENTAL MATERIALS
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages 433-441

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.11.019

Keywords

Zirconia crowns; Leucite-reinforced ceramic crowns; Gold alloy crowns; Resin composite crowns; Strength of molars; 3D finite element method; Simulation of mastication; Contact stresses at a cement-tooth adhesive interface; Modified von Mises failure criterion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. The aim of the study was to compare the strength of thin-walled molar crowns made of various materials under simulation of mastication. Methods. Five 3D FE models of the first lower molar with the use of contact elements were created: intact tooth; tooth with a zirconia crown; tooth with a porcelain crown; tooth with a gold alloy crown and tooth with a composite crown. The computer simulations of mastication were conducted. For the models, equivalent stresseswere calculated using the modified von Mises failure criterion (mvM). Contact stresses at the adhesive interface between the cement and tooth structure under the crowns were analyzed. Results. Equivalent stresses in the crowns, did not exceed the tensile strength of their material. The mvM stresses in resin cement under the zirconia crown were 1.3 MPa, and under the composite crown they increased over 6 times. The tensile and shear contact stressesunder the stiff crowns (ceramics and gold alloy), were several times lower than those under the composite one. The maximum mvM stresses in the tooth structure for the zirconia crown were only 2.8 MPa, whereas for the composite crown were 6.4 MPa. The higher elastic modulus the crown was, the lower the equivalent stresses occurred in the composite luting cement and in the tooth structures. Also contact stresses decreased with the increasing stiffness of the crowns. Significance. Under physiological loads, the thin-walled crowns perfectly luted to molars, made of zirconia ceramic, gold alloys and composite resin are resistant to failure. Prosthetic crowns made of stiff materials are less prone to debonding than those made of composite resin. Prosthetic crowns made of a material with a higher elastic modulus than enamel will strengthen the dental structures of molar teeth. (C) 2011 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available