4.6 Article

Phase transformation changes in thermocycled nickel-titanium orthodontic wires

Journal

DENTAL MATERIALS
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages 666-674

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.010

Keywords

Nickel-titanium; Orthodontic wires; Differential scanning calorimetry; Phase transformations; Thermocycling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective. In the oral environment, orthodontic wires will be subject to thermal fluctuations. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of thermocycling on nickel-titanium (NiTi) wire phase transformations. Methods. Straight segments from single 27 and 35 degrees C copper NiTi (Ormco), Sentalloy (GAC), and Nitinol Heat Activated (3 M Unitek) archwires were sectioned into 5 mm segments (n = 20). A control group consisted of five randomly selected non-thermocycled segments. The remaining segments were thermocycled between 5 and 55 degrees C with five randomly selected segments analyzed with differential scanning calorimetry (DSC; -100 <-> 150 degrees C at 10 degrees C/min) after 1000, 5000, and 10,000 cycles. Thermal peaks were evaluated with results analyzed via ANOVA (alpha = 0.05). Results. Nitinol HA and Sentalloy did not demonstrate qualitative or quantitative phase transformation behavior differences. Significant differences were observed in some of the copper NiTi transformation temperatures, as well as the heating enthalpy with the 27 degrees C copper NiTi wires (p < 0.05). Qualitatively, with increased thermocycling the extent of R-phase in the heating peaks decreased in the 35 degrees C copper NiTi, and an austenite to martensite peak shoulder developed during cooling in the 27 degrees C copper NiTi. Significance. Repeated temperature fluctuations may contribute to qualitative and quantitative phase transformation changes in some NiTi wires. (C) 2010 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available