4.6 Article

Non-irradiated campherquinone induces DNA damage in human gingival fibroblasts

Journal

DENTAL MATERIALS
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages 1556-1563

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.009

Keywords

Gingival fibroblasts; Camphorquinone; Reactive oxygen species; Glutathione; Genotoxicity

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft/German National Science Foundation (DFG) [GE 455/14-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. Camphorquinone (CQ) is cytotoxic in cell cultures. The mechanism of this toxic action, however, is not yet clearly understood. Aim of this investigation was to analyze the effects of non-irradiated CQ on intracellular formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), intracellular glutathione (GSH) content, and the integrity of DNA in cultured primary human gingival fibroblasts (HGF). Methods. Cells were exposed to CQ at concentrations ranging between 0.05mM and 2.5mM. Intracellular levels of ROS were detected by the fluorescent probe 2',7'-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) and GSH was determined by the fluorescent probe monobromobimane (MBBr). Genotoxicity was measured quantitatively by the alkaline comet assay. The cytotoxic effects of CQ were investigated by means of the fluorescent dye propidium iodide and the Cytotoxicity Detection Kit. Results. CQ generated an increase of intracellular ROS, a depletion of intracellular GSH level, decreased cells' viability and total cell number dependent on the applied CQ concentration: 0.5-2.5mM (ROS up arrow, GSH down arrow) and 0.125-2.5mM CQ (cytotoxicity up arrow). Increased DNA damage was observed at all concentrations (0.05-2.5mM, p < 0.05). The ROS-scavenger N-acetylcysteine (NAC) reduced CQ-induced ROS formation at CQ concentrations higher than 0.5mM (p < 0.05). Significance. Our data indicate that non-irradiated CQ induces oxidative stress, DNA damage and cytotoxicity as well in primary HGF. (C) 2009 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available