4.6 Article

Axial shrinkage-stress depends upon both C-factor and composite mass

Journal

DENTAL MATERIALS
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 1-8

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.08.007

Keywords

polymerization shrinkage; stress; C-factor; resin-composite

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. To measure and then mathematically model polymerization stress-dependence upon systematic variations of C-factor (bonded/unbonded area ratio) for the Bioman instrument [1], recording stress by free cantilever-beam deflection; compliance 1.5 mu m/MPa. Methods. A light-cured resin-composite (RZD103; Ivoclar) with 57% (v/v) 450 nm filler was studied. Facing surfaces: glass slab and steel rod-end, constituting the Bioman test chamber, being perpendicular to the measured axial stress-direction, were varied: (a) with rod-diameters (phi), from 1 to 10 mm in 1 mm increments (with 0.8 mm gap height); and then (b) with gap heights (h) in 16 steps from 0.05 to 1.50 mm (with phi = 10 mm). For each h and phi combination, giving C-factors ranging from 0.6 to 100, shrinkage-stress was recorded for 1 h from start of 40 s irradiation at 600 mW cm(-2) for photo-polymerization at 23 degrees C (n = 3). Shrinkage-stress (S-sigma) was plotted directly as functions of h, phi, and C and also per unit composite mass, (S(sigma)g(-1)). ANOVA and Tukey's statistics were applied. Results. Series A-diameter variation; with C-factor increasing from 0.6 to 6, gave an exact exponential decrease in S-sigma from 45 to 8 MPa. Series B-height variation; with C-factor increasing from 3 to 100, gave increasing S-sigma from 1 to 8MPa. Since composite mass played an equally dominant role, plots of stress-variations per unit composite mass, (S(sigma)g(-1)) separated these effects, confirming progressive off-axial stress-relief with increasing h. Significance. (i) Values of h = 0.8 and phi = 10 mm, recommended [1] for Bioman use, were confirmed as appropriate. Every lab instrument for measuring S-sigma necessarily embodies specific C-factors and compliance values in the instrument design. (ii) Configuration (C) factor is recognized as an important parameter affecting manifestation of shrinkage-stress within restorative cavities and luting gaps. However, the restorative mass must equally be considered when translating shrinkage-science into specific clinical recommendations. (c) 2007 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available