4.6 Article

Effect of nanofiller fractions and temperature on polymerization shrinkage on glass fiber reinforced filling material

Journal

DENTAL MATERIALS
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages 606-610

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.020

Keywords

bonded-disk technique; nanofillers; fiber composite

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. The aim was to evaluate the effect of different nanofiller fractions and temperature on polymerization shrinkage strain and degree of monomer conversion of short glass fibers reinforced semi-interpenetrating polymer network (semi-IPN)-polymer matrix composite resin. Methods. Experimental composite resin was prepared by mixing 22.5 wt% of short E-glass fibers (3 mm in length) to the 22.5 wt% of resin matrix with various weight fractions of nanofillers (0, 10, 20, 30,40, 50 wt%) and then 55 wt% of silane treated silica filler were added gradually using high speed mixing machine. Another study group contained composite resin prepared by mixing 22.5 wt% of resin matrix (without nanofillers) to 77.5 wt% of filler particles (without fiber fillers). As control material, commercial particulate filler composite resin was used. The shrinkage strain of the specimens was measured using the bonded-disk technique at 26 and 37 degrees C with respect to time. Degree of conversion of the experimental composites containing different nanofiller fractions was measured using FTIR spectroscopy. Results. ANOVA revealed that fraction of nanofillers and polymerization temperature had significant effect (p < 0.05) on the shrinkage strain and degree of conversion of the composite resin. Shrinkage strain correlated with nanofiller fraction and polymerization temperature (r(2) = 0.96 and 0.95). Significance. The use of high nanofiller fraction with short fiber fillers and IPN-polymer matrix yielded improved rate of shrinkage strain. (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Academy of Dental Materials. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available