4.4 Article

Periodicity of growth rings in Juniperus procera from Ethiopia inferred from crossdating and radiocarbon dating

Journal

DENDROCHRONOLOGIA
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 45-58

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.dendro.2008.08.002

Keywords

Tropical dendrochronology; Mediterranean dendrochronology; Dry afromontane forest; Wood anatomy; COFECHA; Climate-growth relationship

Funding

  1. Swansea University
  2. Royal Geographical Society
  3. Millennium project Dudley Stamp Memorial Trust (Royal Society) [017008-2]
  4. Quaternary ResearcNetherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) h Association
  5. Forestry Research Centre (FRC) of the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR) in Addis Ababa
  6. South Wollo
  7. Debre Sina
  8. Legambo governmental offices

Ask authors/readers for more resources

African pencil cedar (Juniperus procera Hochst. ex Endlicher 1847) is a tropical, irregularly growing species that call produce annual growth rings ill response to an annual cycle of wet and dry seasons. In this paper, we assess the periodicity of growth-ring formation for 13 stern discs from a site in Central-Northern Ethiopia by crossdating and radiocarbon dating. The crossdating process is described more transparently than Usual to allow Open discussion of the methodology employed. Although the ring-width series could be tentatively matched, radiocarbon dating revealed that the growth rings of the junipers from the studied site are neither annual nor represent a common periodicity. It was found that the trees are exceptionally sensitive and respond individually to the complex local climate. For future research, it is recommended to select more mesic sites with an unambiguously unimodal rainfall regime and to gain external evidence to Support assumptions about the periodicity of growth-ring formation in Juniperus procera. (C) 2008 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available