4.2 Article

Distinguishing Subtypes in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Application of the Sydney Language Battery

Journal

DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS
Volume 35, Issue 3-4, Pages 208-218

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000346389

Keywords

Primary progressive aphasia; Cognitive assessment; Clinical diagnosis; Naming; Word repetition; Semantic knowledge

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders [CE110001021]
  2. Australian Postgraduate Awards (APA)
  3. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Clinical Career Development Fellowship [APP1022684]
  4. ARC Federation Fellowship [FF0776229]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) comprises three main subtypes, varying in clinical features, patterns of brain atrophy, and underlying pathology. Differentiation of these variants is important for treatment and planning; however, simple, effective cognitive tests to aid diagnosis are lacking. This study introduces a new language battery - the SYDBAT (Sydney Language Battery) - to assist clinicians. Methods: Fifty-seven PPA patients and 54 age-and education-matched healthy controls were compared on naming, repetition, word comprehension, and semantic association subtests. Results: Significant group differences were found for all tasks, reflecting different language profiles for each group. Using discriminative function analysis, 80% of PPA cases were correctly classified from three SYDBAT scores, from which a simple diagnostic algorithm was defined. Conclusion: The SYDBAT is a fast and simple tool which provides a valuable adjunct to clinicians diagnosing PPA. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available