4.2 Article

Voxel-Based Analysis of Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography Probe [C-11]BF-227 Uptake in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease

Journal

DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 101-111

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000318754

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Mild cognitive impairment; Positron emission tomography; Amyloid

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [20019006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To determine early brain changes in the distribution of an amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) probe, C-11-labeled BF-227 or [C-11] BF-227, in order to accurately predict the progression of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Patients and Methods: Amyloid plaque burden was evaluated using [C-11] BF-227 PET in AD, MCI and aged normal controls. A voxel-based analysis of [C-11] BF-227 PET images was performed to characterize the culprit brain lesion in patients with MCI who were destined to progress to AD, referred to as MCI converters (MCI-C). In addition, binding characteristics of BF-227 to amyloid deposits were examined using postmortem AD brain samples. Results: Voxel-based statistical analyses of the BF-227 PET images clearly demonstrated an abnormal distribution of BF-227 mainly in the posterior association area in MCI-C and patients with AD. BF-227 uptake in the lateral temporal cortex was consistently observed in almost all MCI-C and patients with AD, and it distinguished MCI-C from MCI nonconverters. BF-227 binding strongly correlated with dense amyloid-beta protein plaque density, but not with diffuse plaque density in the frontal cortex. Conclusion: BF-227 uptake in the lateral temporal cortex is a reliable indicator that can be used for predicting prognosis in patients with MCI. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available