3.9 Article

Variation in the TAS1R2 Gene, Sweet Taste Perception and Intake of Sugars

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRIGENETICS AND NUTRIGENOMICS
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 81-90

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000430886

Keywords

Genotype; Sweet taste; Threshold taste; TAS1R2

Funding

  1. Advanced Foods and Materials Network
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/Aims: To determine whether variation in the TAS1R2 gene affects sucrose taste perception and sugar intake. Methods: Participants were men (n = 238) and women (n = 458) aged 20-29 years. A subset (n = 95) with body mass index (BMI) data available completed a sensory analysis study. A food frequency questionnaire assessed dietary intake, and eight polymorphisms were genotyped (rs12033832, rs12137730, rs35874116, rs3935570, rs4920564, rs4920566, rs7513755 and rs9701796). Sucrose taste thresholds were determined by staircase procedure (solutions: 9 x 10(-6) to 0.5 mol/l). Suprathreshold sensitivity to 0.01-1.0 mol/l sucrose solutions was assessed using general Labeled Magnitude Scales. Results: A significant genotype-BMI interaction was observed for rs12033832 (G>A) for suprathreshold sensitivity (p = 0.01) and sugar intake (p = 0.003). Among participants with a BMI G allele carriers had lower sensitivity ratings (mean incremental area under the taste sensitivity curve SE; GG/GA 54.4 +/- 4.1 vs. AA 178.5 +/- 66.6; p = 0.006), higher thresholds (GG/GA 9.3 +/- 1.1 vs. AA 4.4 +/- 4.3 mmol/l; p = 0.004) and consumed more sugars (GG/GA 130 +/- 4 vs. AA 94 +/- 13 g/day; p = 0.009). G allele carriers with a BMI <25 had lower thresholds (GG/GA 8.6 +/- 0.5 vs. AA 16.7 +/- 5.7 mmol/l; p = 0.02) and consumed less sugars (GG/GA 122 +/- 2 vs. AA 145 +/- 8 g/day; p = 0.004). Conclusion: The rs12033832 single nucleotide polymorphism in TAS1R2 is associated with sucrose taste and sugar intake, but the effect differs depending on BMI. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available