4.5 Article

Export and mesopelagic particle flux during a North Atlantic spring diatom bloom

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr.2011.01.006

Keywords

Neutrally buoyant sediment traps; Thorium-234; Particulate organic carbon flux; North Atlantic spring bloom; Transparent exopolymer particles

Categories

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environment Research Council
  2. US National Science Foundation
  3. NERC [noc010009] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [noc010009] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spring diatom blooms are important for sequestering atmospheric CO2 below the permanent thermo-cline in the form of particulate organic carbon (POC). We measured downward POC flux during a sub-polar North Atlantic spring bloom at 100 m using thorium-234 (Th-234) disequilibria, and below 100 m using neutrally buoyant drifting sediment traps. The cruise followed a Lagrangian float, and a pronounced diatom bloom occurred in a 600 km(2) area around the float. Particle flux was low during the first three weeks of the bloom, between 10 and 30 mg POC m(-2) d(-1). Then, nearly 20 days after the bloom had started, export as diagnosed from Th-234 rose to 360-620 mg POC m(-2) d(-1), co-incident with silicate depletion in the surface mixed layer. Sediment traps at 600 and 750 m depth collected 160 and 150 mg POC m(-2) d(-1), with a settled volume of particles of 1000-1500 mL m(-2) d(-1). This implies that 25-43% of the 100 m POC export sank below 750 m. The sinking particles were ungrazed diatom aggregates that contained transparent exopolymer particles (TEP). We conclude that diatom blooms can lead to substantial particle export that is transferred efficiently through the mesopelagic. We also present an improved method of calibrating the Alcian Blue solution against Gum Xanthan for TEP measurements. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available