4.7 Article

Two luminescent lanthanide( III) metal- organic frameworks as chemosensors for high- efficiency recognition of Cr( VI) anions in aqueous solution plus Ji- Yong Zou, * a Ling Li, a Sheng- Yong You, a Yue- Wei Liu, a Hong- Min

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 47, Issue 44, Pages -

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8dt03050b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21473121, 21561014, 21562023]
  2. Key Research Project of Jiangxi Province [20171BBF60074]
  3. Key Research Project of Jiangxi Academy of Sciences [2018-YZD2-11]
  4. Project on the Integration of Industry, Education and Research of Jiangxi Academy of Sciences [2016-YCXY-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two new lanthanide(iii) metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) {[(CH3)(2)NH2](2)[Ln(4)(FDA)(7)(DMF)(2)] 0.5DMF}(n) [Ln = Eu (1), and Tb (2)] based on furan-2,5-dicarboxylic acid (H(2)FDA) have been successfully assembled and well characterized in detail. These MOFs are isostructural and demonstrate 12-connected sqc15 topologies, which are rarely observed in MOF chemistry, especially in lanthanide(iii) MOFs. Moreover, these two MOFs could show a tolerance towards moisture and organic solvents and satisfactory chemical stabilities. More importantly, they exhibit sensitive and selective luminescence quenching response towards Cr2O72- and CrO42- anions in aqueous solution with the average quenching K-sv values of 1.25 x 10(4) L mol(-1) (Cr2O72-) and 3.56 x 10(3) L mol(-1) (CrO42-) for 1 and 1.46 x 10(4) L mol(-1) (Cr2O72-) and 4.35 x 10(3) L mol(-1) (CrO42-) for 2 and the detection limits of 1.14 x 10(-4) mol L-1 (Cr2O72-) and 1.12 x 10(-4) mol L-1 (CrO42-) for 1 and 7.42 x 10(-5) mol L-1 (Cr2O72-) and 1.27 x 10(-4) mol L-1 (CrO42-) for 2. The high quenching K-sv values and low detection limits make them more feasible in sensing Cr(vi) anions in aqueous solution. The possible detection mechanism has been discussed in detail.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available