4.7 Article

A comparative synthetic, magnetic and theoretical study of functional M4Cl4 cubane-type Co(II) and Ni(II) complexes

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 43, Issue 21, Pages 7847-7859

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4dt00306c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CNRS
  2. Ministere de la Recherche (Paris)
  3. DFH/UFA (International Research Training Group 'GRK532')
  4. International Centre for Frontier Research in Chemistry, Strasbourg (icFRC)
  5. DFG
  6. Spanish Government [CTQ2011-23140, RYC-200802493]
  7. Service de Radiocristallographie, Institut de Chimie [UMR 7177 CNRS-UdS]
  8. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe the synthesis, structures, and magnetochemistry of new M4Cl4 cubane-type cobalt( II) and nickel(II) complexes with the formula [M(mu(3)-Cl)Cl(HL center dot S)](4) (1: M = Co; 2: M = Ni), where HL center dot S represents a pyridyl-alcohol-type ligand with a thioether functional group, introduced to allow subsequent binding to Au surfaces. Dc and ac magnetic susceptibility data of 1 and 2 were modeled with a full spin Hamiltonian implemented in the computational framework CONDON 2.0. Although both coordination clusters 1 and 2 are isostructural, with each of their transition metal ions in a pseudo-octahedral coordination environment of four Cl atoms and N,O-donor atoms of one chelating HL center dot S ligand, the substantially different ligand field effects of Co(II) and Ni(II) results in stark differences in their magnetism. In contrast to compound 1 which exhibits a dominant antiferromagnetic intramolecular coupling (J = -0.14 cm(-1)), 2 is characterised by a ferromagnetic coupling (J = +10.6 cm(-1)) and is considered to be a single-molecule magnet (SMM), a feature of special interest for future surface deposition studies. An analysis based on density functional theory (DFT) was performed to explore possible magnetostructural correlations in these compounds. Using a two-J model Hamiltonian, it revealed that compound 1 has four positive and two (small) negative J(Co)...(Co) isotropic interactions leading to a SHS = 6 ground state. Taking into account the magnetic anisotropy, one would recover a MS = 0 ground state since D > 0 from computations. In 2, all the J constants are positive and, in this framework, the zero-field splitting energy characterising the axial anisotropy was estimated to be negative (D = -0.44 cm(-1)). The computational results are consistent with compound 2 being an SMM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available