4.7 Article

CFA-2 and CFA-3 (Coordination Framework Augsburg University-2 and-3); novel MOFs assembled from trinuclear Cu(I)/Ag(I) secondary building units and 3,3′,5,5′-tetraphenyl-bipyrazolate ligands

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 42, Issue 19, Pages 6909-6921

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3dt32302a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, Research and Art Baden-Wuerttemberg
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) within Priority Program Porous Metal-Organic Frameworks (SPP 1362, MOFs)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The syntheses of H-2-phbpz, [Cu-2(phbpz)]center dot 2DEF center dot MeOH (CFA-2) and [Ag-2(phbpz)] (CFA-3) (H-2-phbpz = 3,3',5,5'-tetraphenyl-1H,1'H-4,4'-bipyrazole) compounds and their crystal structures are described. The Cu(I) containing metal-organic framework CFA-2 crystallizes in the tetragonal crystal system, within space group I4(1)/a (no. 88) and the following unit cell parameters: a = 30.835(14), c = 29.306(7) angstrom, V = 27865(19) angstrom(3). CFA-2 features a flexible 3-D three-connected two-fold interpenetrated porous structure constructed of triangular Cu(I) subunits. Upon exposure to different kinds of liquids (MeOH, EtOH, DMF, DEF) CFA-2 shows pronounced breathing effects. CFA-3 crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system, within space group P2(1)/c (no. 14) and the following unit cell parameters: a = 16.3399(3), b = 32.7506(4), c = 16.2624(3) angstrom, beta = 107.382(2)degrees, V = 8305.3(2) angstrom(3). In contrast to the former compound, CFA-3 features a layered 2-D three-connected structure constructed from triangular Ag(I) subunits. Both compounds are characterized by elemental and thermogravimetric analyses, single crystal structure analysis and X-ray powder diffraction, FTIR-and fluorescence spectroscopy. Preliminary results on oxygen activation in CFA-2 are presented and potential improvements in terms of framework robustness and catalytic efficiency are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available